Tag Archives: fines

Your Florida Condominium Board Member Electronic Voting and Communication Policy

Posted on February 2, 2014 | 13 Comments

The use of email and other forms of electronic communication in the operations of condominium associations continues to be a controversial and confusing topic in Florida. The Florida Statutes are significantly behind the times as it relates to technological advances and, therefore, do not provide any guidance around when, if ever, Board email communication and voting is allowed. Further, these issues have not been sufficiently litigated to have a clear understanding of what Florida courts consider legal behavior.

One the one hand, using no electronic communication in this day and age is completely unreasonable. On the other hand, if a Board chooses to conduct all business electronically, the unit owners are denied their right to be present during Board meetings, which violates the law and leads to unit owner distrust of the Board. Given this, all associations can do is comply with the spirit of the Florida condominium statutes (Chapter 718) and use good judgment when conducting association business via email or other electronic communication. In order to ensure all Board members act consistently, I recommend that each association draft and approve a Board Member Electronic Voting and Communication Policy.

Florida Statute Chapter 718.112(2)(c) is clear that all unit owners have the right to attend any meeting of the Board at which a quorum of the Board is present. This means that any gathering of a quorum of the Board, whether at the standard meeting location, in a Board member’s home, or at a local restaurant, is considered a Board meeting if association-related topics are being discussed. It is a common misconception that in order for a gathering of the Board to be considered an official meeting, the Board has to be voting on something. This is not the case.

There are two notable types of meetings that are not open to unit owners:

1. Meetings between the Board and the association’s attorney to discuss litigation and obtain legal advice

2. Board meetings held for the purpose of discussing personnel matters (e.g., employee issues)

The Statute also states that notice of Board meetings (including date, time and location) along with a meeting agenda must be posted conspicuously around the condominium property at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. This requirement also applies to the two types of meeting mentioned above that are not open to unit owners.

 NOTE: The Statutes are silent regarding where Board meetings may take place. However, the Statutes do specify that the annual meeting must be held within 45 miles of the condominium property so this is a good guideline for all Board meetings.

 Based on the above definition of a Board meeting, an email chain or other form of electronic discussion (e.g., a chat room, web-based conference) where association-related items are being discussed by a quorum of the Board would be considered a Board meeting. Notice for this meeting would have to be posted 48 hours in advance and all unit owners would have the right to attend. As this is impossible in the context of a Board member group email, technically any emails between a quorum of the Board are in violation of the Florida Statutes.

NOTE: In theory, the association could set up some type of web-based conference with a login that all unit owners have. So long as the meeting was properly noticed and all unit owners have access, I believe (though there is no case law to support this that I am aware of) this would comply with the Florida Statutes.

 So, given the rules just discussed, what is a Board to do? My recommendation is to use electronic communication (e.g., email, group texting) but do so in a responsible and considerate way. Remember, Board meeting rules are established to ensure unit owners may remain up-to-date on association issues. Unit owners are only going to become concerned if they feel their rights are being violated and/ or if the Board is acting secretively or unethically. Given this, when considering a Board Member Electronic Voting and Communication Policy, the Board should worry  less about complying with the exact letter of the law and more about ensuring the Board is acting in a way that unit owners would consider appropriate.

NOTE: If a unit owner files a complaint against the association to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) and the DBPR finds the complaint warranted, the association may be fined pursuant to the Florida Administrative Code. Learn more here.

Board Member Electronic Voting and Communication Policy

As association’s policy regarding electronic voting and communication should be reviewed and approved by a quorum of the Board at a properly noticed Board meeting. This gives unit owners the opportunity to provide feedback and helps to protect the Board in the event a unit owner complains about the policy down the road. As I recommend with all policies, the Board should review and re-approve the policy annually (perhaps at the meeting following the annual meeting given the likely presence of new Board members). In my opinion, this policy should include:

1. A requirement that each Board member and the property manager establish an email account for the specific use of association business. The Board member/ property should be required to stop using the account and provide the association access to the account once the Board member/ manager ceases to be involved with the association. Why do this?

  • This requirement can prove to be very useful when a Board member or manager leaves. As association business with attorneys, CPAs, maintenance vendors and unit owners is often conducted via email, losing all of those records can be detrimental to the smooth operations of the association.
  • Depending on the type of communication, these emails may be considered part of the Official Records of the association and, therefore, the association may be required to keep some of them for up to seven years.
  • Knowing that emails may be viewed by future Board members encourages the current Board members/ manager from saying anything via email that they would not want others to read. Comments made via email have hurt associations during litigation when emails were admitted into evidence.

2. A requirement that electronic communications between a quorum of the Board are only to be used as a means to transmit information and not as a discussion forum. For example, a Board member can send an email to the Board providing an update regarding an association project or providing an opinion on an upcoming meeting agenda item (perhaps the Board member won’t be there). These messages should be in FYI format and should not ask the Board to provide feedback. If an informative email from a Board member elicits a back-and-forth discussion, the emails should cease and a Board meeting should be scheduled. There are no restrictions on communications between less than a quorum of the Board.

3. A requirement that no Board voting take place electronically unless there is no other option. For example, the association’s insurance policies are up for renewal in 5 days and the Board’s next meeting is scheduled for tomorrow. At the time of the meeting, the insurance broker was unable to obtain all necessary insurance quotes. Due to scheduling conflicts, a quorum of the Board will not be able to meet again before the policies expire. Once the quotes are received, the Board reviews them and votes via email to renew the current policies.

These types of situations, calling for an electronic vote, arise from time to time and the association’s Board Member Electronic Voting and Communication Policy should outline how to proceed during and after the electronic vote. Here are some general guidelines regarding electronic voting:

1. Robert’s Rules of Order should be followed as best as possible:

  • A Board member should send an email with a motion to the Board
  • Another member should second the motion in an email to the Board and ask “All in Favor?”
  • All Board members should respond to the Board with a “yes” or a “no” vote

2. The vote should be included on the agenda for the next Board meeting and ratified

3. The minutes should provide an explanation as to why the vote was cast via email and a copy of the email chain showing the Board’s vote should be included with the minutes.

NOTE: You may have heard that Boards are allowed to vote via email so long as the vote is unanimous. This relates to non-profit law (Florida Statutes Chapter 617), which allows for voting outside of a Board meeting if all Board members vote unanimously in writing. Whether this Statute allows for written votes via email (as opposed to a signed document) is unclear. Regardless, for condominium associations the Florida Condominium Statutes (Chapter 718) overrule Chapter 617 when there is a conflict and Chapter 718 does not allow Boards to avoid a meeting by voting unanimously in writing.

I hope this overview of electronic Board communication has been helpful. Our management and consulting firm, VERA Property Management, will gladly draft a Board Member Email Voting and Communication Policy for your association. Please contact us today for a quote.

As always, feel free to reach out with questions or comments.

Emily

Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a firm providing full-service community association management in the Tampa Bay Area as well as consulting, financial and legal services to all Florida community associations. 

→ 13 Comments

Posted in Board Meetings, Florida Statutes, Policies

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and Florida Condominium Associations

Posted on December 4, 2013 | 38 Comments

Sure, you’ve heard of Chapter 718 of the Florida Statutes, that seemingly unending document that governs condominium associations. But there is one other set of rules out there that Board members frequently overlook: The Florida Administrative Code (f.k.a. FAC or F.A.C.). Heard of it? Many Board members have not and yet it is essential to the proper operation of a Florida condominium association.

The F.A.C. combines all rules promulgated by state regulatory agencies. For the purposes of Florida condominium associations, the F.A.C. expands on the guidance provided in Chapter 718 of the Florida Statutes relating to record keeping, financial statement preparation, Board member elections, and other operational issues.

The F.A.C. should be read in conjunction with the Florida Statutes. Failure to comply with the Florida Statutes and the F.A.C. can lead to action by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) including fines of up to $5,000 per violation.

The full FAC can be found at www.flrules.org.

F.A.C. chapters 61B-15 – 61B-25 along with 61B-45 and 61B-50 provide specific guidance on many important condominium topics that are addressed more generally in Chapter 718. For unit owner-controlled (versus developer-controlled) condominiums, the most relevant sections are 61B-21, -22 and -23.

Chapter 61B-21 discusses the actions the DBPR will take in response to complaints submitted by unit owners surrounding an association’s violation of the F.A.C. and/ or Florida Statutes. Violations are separated into minor and major violations; a list of violations is included within the code. Initial minor or major violations are generally handled through communication with the association, warning letters, and distribution of educational materials relevant to the alleged violation. In circumstances where minor or major violations are repeated or an association fails to resolve an initial violation, an investigator from DBPR may be assigned to the case.

The F.A.C. dictates that the DBPR may levy fines against an association of up to $5,000 per violation. Generally fines are determined based on a price per unit. For minor violations, the penalty will range from $1-$5 per unit, up to $2,500 per violation. For major violations, the penalty will range from $6-$20 per unit, up to $5,000 per violation. The total amount ultimately fined may be influenced by a variety of aggravating or mitigating factors listed in the F.A.C. Aggravating factors include substantial harm or financial loss to homeowners; association delay in taking corrective action; and past violations. Mitigating factors include reliance on written expert counsel***; no substantial harm or financial loss to homeowners; and association cooperativeness with the DBPR during the investigation.

***It is important to note here that reliance on a licensed community association manager (LCAM) is not a defense for failing to comply with the F.A.C. or Florida Statutes. It is very important that Board members review the actions of their LCAM to ensure compliance.

Chapter 61B-22 relates to financial and accounting requirements, including budgeting and reserve requirements. This section outlines all the required components of the annual budget; the proper treatment of common expense guarantees; reserve calculations (using both the component and pooled methods); the timing and handling of reserve fund contributions; procedures for waiving or reducing reserve contributions; and the specific requirements of the association’s year-end financial reporting.

Chapter 61B-23 discusses Board meetings and the Board’s fiduciary duty; rules relating to the video taping of Board meetings; the requirement that each condominium pay a $4/ unit annual fee to the DBPR due by January 1st; voting to forego the retrofitting of fire and life safety systems; the use and form of limited proxies; the required Frequently Asked Questions and Answers sheet; the items included in the association’s official records; Board elections/ recalls/ vacancies; and the electronic transmission of notices.

We will review 61B-22 and 61B-23 in more detail in future posts. For now, don’t forget to read the code.

As always, please feel free to reach out with questions.

Emily

Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a full-service community association management and consulting firm serving the Tampa Bay Area.

→ 38 Comments

Posted in Florida Statutes

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Florida Condominium Association Rules & Regulations: Drafting a Violation Policy and Issuing Fines

Posted on November 7, 2013 | 61 Comments

Every condominium association’s Declaration of Condominium and Bylaws incorporate rules and regulations that homeowners (and their tenants and guests) are obligated to follow. Further, most association Governing Documents allow for Boards of Directors to establish additional reasonable rules and regulations (through a Board vote at a properly called meeting) so long as they do not conflict with anything in the Governing Documents. The Governing Documents are often very long, a bore to read, and confusing for many homeowners. Add to that the variety of different rules the Board adopts and it is not surprising that most homeowners don’t know all the rules they are supposed to follow.

While there is no specific Florida Statute that outlines how rules and regulations adopted by the Board must be communicated, I strongly recommend that each association consider a method for routinely and thoroughly communicating the rules to homeowners and other residents. My preferred method of accomplishing this is by drafting a comprehensive Rules and Regulations document that is accompanied by a Violation Policy, outlining how violations are identified, the consequences of a violation, and the means of appealing a violation. We will go into more detail about the Violation Policy later in the post.

There are several reasons why drafting a current Rules and Regulations document with an associated Violation Policy is so important:

1.     Residents are more likely to follow rules if they know them.

2.     Residents are more likely to follow rules if there are consequences associated with violating them.

3.     For associations that are professionally managed, the Violation Policy provides a clear outline for the management company to follow when identifying violations, sending violation letters, etc. This transfers the control of rule enforcement from the manager to the Board, which is essential as management companies often fail to customize policies such as these to each property they manage.

4.     For self-managed associations, the Violation Policy provides the Board a consistent way to enforce the association’s rules, helping to avoid homeowner/ resident claims of personal bias.

The Rules and Regulations along with the Violation Policy should be (1) updated anytime a new rule is passed, (2) reviewed at least annually by the Board, (3) included on the association’s website, (4) provided to new homeowners and residents, and (4) disseminated to the homeowners and residents (via email or snail mail) at least annually but also every time a change has been made.

Components of the Violation Policy

At a minimum, the Violation Policy should include the following sections:

1. Fines Associated with Rule Violations: Often, Boards will choose to have increasing fines for multiple infractions. For example, the first violation may just be a warning, the second a $25 fine, and the third and subsequent violations a $50 fine. The fine can be determined by the number of violations of a unique rule committed by a homeowner/ resident, or by the aggregate number of total violations committed by a homeowner/ resident. It’s up to the Board. However, it is imperative that any fines issued by the Board comply with the association’s Governing Documents and the Florida Statutes. Certain Governing Documents do not allow for fines or have specific rules regarding the issuance of fines.

Florida Statute Rule Regarding Fine Amounts: According to Florida Statute 718.303(3), the Board may issue fines for violations of the association’s rule and regulations. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation; however, an additional fine up to $100 may be levied for each day a violation continues. Fines for a particular violation may not exceed $1,000 in aggregate. Florida Statute 718.303(3)(a) allows the association to suspend a resident’s common elements (i.e., amenities) use rights for a “reasonable period of time” as consequence for failing to abide by the rules and regulations.

2. Corrective Action Time Frame: If a violation requires corrective action on the part of the resident (e.g. a resident’s window shades are not an approved color so the resident will receive a fine AND must remove the shades), the Violation Policy should specify how long the resident has to correct the violation before a subsequent fine is assessed. Further, the policy should outline the action the association may take if a violation requiring corrective action continues for an extended period of time (e.g. the resident refuses to take down the shades). Florida Statute 718.303(1) allows the association to bring legal action against a homeowner or other resident for failure to comply with the rules and regulations.

3.     Violation Identification Process: How a violation must be identified and documented should be detailed. These rules should be drafted to eliminate any possibility of bias against a specific homeowner/ resident as well as “he said, she said” situations. A detailed and consistently implemented violation identification process reduces the likelihood of appeal. Sometimes the Governing Documents, often for violations relating to pets or noise, will have a process pre-established; however, in most instances this is not the case and it is up to the Board to create reasonable guidelines. Here are a few recommendations:

 a.     For visible violations (e.g., storing unapproved items on a balcony), a violation should be captured through a clear photograph of the violation for the association’s records (the ideal way), or by written confirmation that the violation exists by TWO designated persons (i.e., the property manager and the Board). I personally recommend that only the property manager or a Board member be allowed to identify visible violations. If a homeowner/ resident notices a violation, they should inform the property manager and/ or Board member(s) for verification.

b.    For noise violations (e.g., loud music, dog barking), a sound recording of the noise should be taken by a designated person (or by the complaining homeowner/ resident) for the association’s records (the ideal way). If this is not possible, written confirmation of the noise should be obtained by TWO persons (i.e., the property manager, the Board members, or residents).

4.     Non-Homeowner Residents: The policy should specify how violations are handled when they are committed by non-homeowner residents (e.g., tenants, guests). It is my recommendation that the policy clarify that all non-homeowner residents are required to abide by the rules and regulations of the Association and may be assessed fines if they fail to do so. To encourage homeowners to thoughtfully select non-homeowner residents, and to encourage homeowners to inform them of the rules and regulations, the policy should specify that homeowners are ultimately responsible for any unpaid fines incurred by their non-homeowner residents.

5.     Violation Appeal Process: The policy should outline the process homeowners must follow to request an appeal of a violation. This process should include whether or not non-homeowner residents are entitled to request an appeal or if requests must be made by homeowners.

Florida Statute Rule Regarding Fine Appeals: According to Florida Statute 718.303(3)(b), the association must provide homeowners 14 days written notice prior to imposing a fine during which time the homeowner may request an appeal. An Appeals Committee must be established for the purpose and no Board members may be on the committee. If the Appeals Committee does not agree with the proposed fine, the association may not impose it.

6.     Violation Letter Template: To ensure consistency, the Board of Directors may wish to draft a violation letter that the property manager, administrative assistant or Board member responsible for issuing violations should use to communicate all violations.

7.     Failure to Pay a Fine: The consequences for failure to pay a fine should be outlined in the policy. Per Florida Statute 718.303(3), the Association may not lien a unit if a homeowner fails to pay a fine; however, the association does have the ability to suspend a homeowner’s (and non-homeowner resident’s) common element use rights and voting rights. Further, the association may choose to use a collections agency to collect past due fines. Lastly, so long as the Governing Documents do not prohibit such action, the association may prevent the homeowner from renting their unit if past due fines have accrued.

Florida Statutes Rule Regarding the Suspension of Voting Rights and Common Elements Use Rights: Pursuant to Chapter 718.303(4) and 718.303(5), the association may suspend the voting rights and common elements use rights of any homeowner that is more than 90 days past due in any monetary obligation due to the association. These suspensions must be approved at a Board meeting and the homeowner must be notified in writing of the suspension.

Once the association has begun issuing violation letters and associated fines, the association should maintain a violation log to keep track of violations, fines, appeal status, fine due date, and date of fine payment.

I hope this information has been helpful. As always, I recommend all policies be reviewed by the association’s attorney prior to implementation.

Emily

Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a full-service community association management and consulting firm serving the Tampa Bay Area.

→ 61 Comments

Posted in Florida Statutes, rules & regulations

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,