Tag Archives: 718.112

Florida Condominium Associations: Creating Quality Board Meeting Agendas and Minutes

Posted on March 24, 2014 | 39 Comments

NOTE: This post reflects our opinions and ideas and should not be taken as legal advice or professional guidance. References to language in the Florida Statutes or Florida Administrative Code are based on our reading and laymen’s interpretation of these documents. As always, we strongly encourage you to consult with legal counsel regarding the interpretation of law.

Board meeting agendas and meeting minutes are a key part of condominium associations’ official records. For unit owners not actively involved with the association, they are the primary way to follow along with the board’s activities. Given this, it is important that the board produce quality agendas and meeting minutes. Generally, these two documents should provide sufficient detail so that a unit owner with no previous knowledge of the property will understand what the board is considering and the reasoning behind board actions. Agendas and meeting minutes are also reviewed by the association’s CPA during audits, and are some of the primary documents the Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) examines to resolve complaints against associations. Lastly, new managers or board members use meeting minutes to obtain insight into past association issues. In sum, having detailed agendas and meeting minutes can prove invaluable.

There is significant confusion around how agendas and meeting minutes should be formatted, and what information they must contain. The Florida Statutes provide little guidance on these topics, leaving it to the boards and their managers to determine what is appropriate. Many standard formats (i.e., Robert’s Rules of Order) are used and often the community’s bylaws will provide guidelines. The board is obligated to follow any agenda, meeting minutes or board meeting format requirements outlined in their governing documents. That being said, if your documents indicate that Robert’s Rules should be followed, the board should review these Rules and make reasonable decisions about how to apply them to a casual condominium board meeting. For example, there is no need to stand to make a motion and no need for the president to recognize a board member before they speak despite what Robert’s Rules tells us.

This post will outline key considerations when constructing a format for your agendas and meeting minutes. It should be read in conjunction with my post on unit owner rights and association responsibilities at board meetings. We will discuss an appropriate and abbreviated version of Robert’s Rules for association meetings in a separate post.

Agendas

Florida Statute 718.112(2)(c) provides the following agenda requirements:

  • All regular board meeting agendas must be posted visibly on the condominium property at least 48 hours in advance of a meeting. NOTE: Members’ meetings (e.g., annual meeting), budget meetings and certain other meetings require additional advanced notice.
  • If there is no condominium property available where notices may be posted, the board must mail or email (if electronic consent form has been received) the agenda to all unit owners 14 days in advance of the meeting.
  • The board must adopt an official location for posting agendas on property.
  • Any item that will be discussed by the board at a meeting must be listed on the agenda.
  • If 20% or more of a community’s members petition to have an item on the agenda, the board must add this item to an agenda within 60 days of receipt of the petition.
  • Board meetings held in the event of an emergency may be held without a previously posted agenda.
  • Items not listed on an agenda may be taken up at a meeting on an emergency basis by a vote of a majority plus one of the board members.

NOTE: The DBPR has reprimanded associations for holding “emergency” meetings and discussing “emergency” items that are not true emergencies. If the board can wait 48 hours for proper notice to be posted before discussing the item, then the board should do so.

The above Florida Statute requirements do not provide any guidance on how a meeting agenda should be structured. This is up to the board to decide.  I recommend that an agenda format be approved by the board and used consistently. To better inform the unit owners, I also recommend that the agenda include a brief sentence on the purpose of each agenda item. For example, an agenda may list “Landscaping” as one of the items but to a unit owner that may mean very little. An agenda item like this is much more informative: “Landscaping: the board is considering proposals to replace all plants surrounding the front fountain”. Most management companies have their own agenda formats but the board can certainly request changes to that format.

Below, I have listed the primary sections of a board meeting agenda with some guidance on each item. They are listed below in the order which I would recommend they be listed on the agenda and addressed at the meeting.

NOTE: We will gladly provide a template agenda upon request.

1.     Meeting Date, Time and Location:  This information must be included on every posted agenda.

2.     Call to Order, Proof of Quorum, Proof of Notice & Roll Call: This item should be the first item at every meeting and is primarily a formality. The president will call the meeting to order, specify the time, and confirm that the agenda was properly posted at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. The board members present should state their names and positions to confirm a quorum has been obtained.

3.     Special Speakers or Guests: Sometimes boards will request special guests attend a meeting. For example, the association may request that its insurance broker come to a meeting to discuss insurance policy renewal. I generally recommend listing any agenda items relating to guests at the top of the agenda so that the guest may conduct their business and then leave without having to sit through a long meeting.

4.     Prior Meeting’s Minutes: Minutes from the previous board meeting should be reviewed and approved by the board. If your community follows Robert’s Rules, they are required to be read aloud. To avoid this, the board should receive and make changes to draft minutes in advance of the meeting. If done this way, they do not need to be read aloud. Getting draft minutes to the board for review within a few days of a meeting really helps with accuracy as the information is fresh in the members’ minds.

5.     Manager/ Board Member/ Committee Reports: If the manager, a board member (typically the president) or committee head wishes to provide an update on specific items, they should be listed on the agenda. Further, I would recommend a brief listing of the topics they will discuss. Just listing “President’s Report” could be used as a catch all agenda item during which the president/ board may talk about any association topic. In my opinion, this does not comply with the spirit of the Florida Statutes.

6.     Treasurer’s Report/ Financial Statements Review: The association’s most recent monthly (or quarterly) financial statements should be reviewed and approved at each meeting. Any items the board may need to vote on relating to collection efforts (e.g., a vote to lien a unit) should also be listed as an agenda item (specific unit numbers may be listed).

7.     Amenities Use & Voting Rights Suspensions: As discussed in this post, boards must vote to suspend the amenities use rights or voting rights of unit owners in arrears. As such, this should be listed as an agenda item (specific unit numbers may be listed).

8.     Unit Owner Comments/ Questions/ Concerns: As discussed in our post on unit owner rights at board meeting, unit owners have the right to speak on any agenda item. I recommend listing an agenda item specifically for this purpose near the beginning of the meeting.

9.     Old and New Business: This section should include any business the board wishes to discuss. Keep in mind that the agenda should include all discussion items not just those that the board plans to take a final vote on at the meeting.

10.  Email Vote Ratification: While boards should try to avoid voting by email entirely (see this post for more information), if the board does vote via email I recommend that the item be included in the next meeting’s agenda and ratified at the meeting.

11.  Adjournment: Similar to #2 above, this is a formality. The time of adjournment should be specified.

 

Meeting Minutes

According to Florida Statute 718.111, meeting minutes must be taken for each board meeting. In my opinion this includes those meetings not open to unit owners (though minutes should be brief). Further, minutes must be retained for at least 7 years and must include how each board member voted on each item including if the board member abstained from voting. These are the only requirements for meeting minutes per Chapter 718. Robert’s Rules provide guidelines on preparation of meeting minutes but otherwise the style and content of the meeting minutes is up to the board.

I recommend the following as it relates to constructing meeting minutes:

1. Use the meeting’s agenda as a base for the meeting minutes.

2. Include meeting start and end times.

3. List the board members, unit owner and other guests in attendance (including those present by phone)

4. Record the meeting and listen to the tape while drafting the minutes to ensure accuracy. Tapes may be destroyed once meeting minutes are approved.

5. Ensure the minutes are sufficiently thorough for a unit owner not present at the meeting to understand what actions were taken by the board and why.

6. Transcribe the specific wording of each motion including who voted in favor of or against the motion.

7. Include any identified board member or manager conflicts of interest.

8. Briefly summarize any discussions the board had that did not end in a vote.

9. Do not include board member quotes or the specific opinions of one board member (unless requested by the board member).

10. If email votes were ratified at the meeting, Include copies of the email chain showing the vote with the meeting minutes.

The board of my association has begun attaching a “status update” document to our meeting minutes which I think is very helpful. This document specifies what actions have occurred on each agenda item from the time of the last meeting to the time of the current meeting. For example, if in last month’s meeting the board voted to re-landscape an area of the property, the “status update” document (which is provided to the board for review and approval at the current meeting along with the draft minutes of the prior meeting) would state something like: “Landscapers removed all old plants and have replaced all irrigation piping. New plants are scheduled to be installed next week”. This provides and straightforward way for unit owners to obtain updates on the status of past agenda items.

Hopefully this overview of agendas and minutes has been helpful. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out.

Emily

Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a firm providing full-service community association management in the Tampa Bay Area as well as consulting, financial and legal services to all Florida community associations. 

→ 39 Comments

Posted in Board Meetings, Florida Statutes

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Reserving Funding Requirements and the Procedures for Waiving Reserves in Florida Condominium Associations

Posted on March 4, 2014 | 108 Comments

Florida law is very clear: every association must fully fund reserves unless a vote to waive reserves is obtained. This post will review the reserve funding requirements detailed in the Florida Statutes/ Florida Administrative Code and the process for waiving reserves.

Reserve Funding Basics

NOTE: There are specific requirements for developer-controlled condominiums and multicondominiums that are not discussed here.

Section 718.112(2)(f) of the Florida Statutes and Rule 61B-22.005 of the Florida Administrative Code require ALL Florida condominium associations to fund reserve accounts for deferred property maintenance and replacement projects. Specifically, a reserve account must be established for roofing replacement, property painting, asphalt paving, and any other project that has an anticipated cost of greater than $10,000.

For each identified project, the association must identify the anticipated date and cost of the project. For example, a community’s roof may have an estimated remaining useful life of 10 years and replacement cost of $50,000. Therefore, in 10 years, the association will need to have $50,000 in the roof reserve account to pay for the replacement.

The association must calculate annually the amount it needs to contribute to its reserve accounts and include this amount in the budget. Generally, associations will collect one maintenance fee payment from each unit owner monthly or quarterly and deposit it into an operating account. From there, the percentage of maintenance fees allocated to reserves per the budget is transferred into a separate reserve account. Reserve and operating funds may not be commingled for more than 30 days from the date of receipt of a maintenance fee payment. As such, if an association receives maintenance fees monthly (quarterly), they must contribute the appropriate amount to their reserve funds monthly (quarterly).

NOTE: There are two ways to look at monthly or quarterly reserve funding. Let’s look at an example. An association has a $100,000 annual budget with $20,000 (20%) allocated to reserve funding. The association requires maintenance fee payments monthly. In a given month, the association should received $8,333 in maintenance fees ($100,000/12) of which $1,667 is allocated to reserves ($8,333*20%). Let’s say in January the association actually received $7,000 in maintenance fees (several units failed to pay). The association could choose to fully fund the reserve account that month by transferring $1,667 dollars of the maintenance fees received to a reserve account. Or, the association could choose to only transfer $1,400 ($7,000*20%) to a reserve account, as they have not yet received the maintenance fees that would have contributed the remaining $267 ($1,667-$1,400) in reserve funds. The majority of associations (and management companies) choose the first option, ensuring that reserves stay fully funded. Both are acceptable per the law in my opinion. While the first option is preferable, if there is a situation where a large percentage of unit owners fail to pay maintenance fees and contributing the full budgeted monthly amount to the reserve account would hinder the association’s operations, then the second option may be best.

Florida law specifies two acceptable methods for calculating the necessary annual reserve contribution: pooling or straight line (component). We have discussed these two methods as well as the pros and cons of each here.

Recap: So, we know that condominiums must budget for sufficient reserve funds to pay for all long-term maintenance and replacement projects greater than $10,000. Further, we know that the annual reserve contribution necessary is based on the expected timing and cost of each project using one of two calculation methods (pooling or straight line). Great. But how does a board know exactly what projects greater than $10,000 will need to be done, when they will need to be done, or how much they will cost?

This is where a reserve study comes in. A reserve study is a professional engineering survey of your property. The reserve study firm will examine the property and determine what major capital maintenance and replacement projects will need to be done in the next 30 years. The study will provide expected costs of each project and expected timeframe for completion. While there is no specific requirement in Florida law that associations obtain a professional reserve study, I don’t see any way for a board to properly determine annual reserve contributions without one. I recommend a reserve study be completed every 2-3 years. Prices generally range from $3,000 – $6,000 for an initial study with a reduction in price for study updates completed by the same firm. To ensure the association always has the funds to complete routine reserve studies, I recommend including a reserve account for the study itself.

NOTE: If you need a good reserve study firm, I have had great success with Reserve Advisors.

Waiving Reserve Contributions

For those communities where, for whatever reason, fully funding reserves is infeasible, Florida law provides the option to reduce or eliminate reserve funding. Here’s how it works.

Every year, the board must present a proposed budget to the community assuming full reserve funding. The association cannot hold a vote to waive or reduce reserve funding until after a proposed budget with full reserve funding has been provided to the membership. If the board would like to put a vote on the table to reduce or waive reserves funding, then they should provide (along with the proposed budget which must be distributed 14 days prior to the budget meeting): (1) a second budget with waived or reduced reserves and (2) a limited proxy to be filled out by unit owners specifically requesting the membership to vote on the second budget. The proxy must include the following wording per Florida Statutes:

WAIVING OF RESERVES, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR ALLOWING ALTERNATIVE USES OF EXISTING RESERVES MAY RESULT IN UNIT OWNER LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT OF UNANTICIPATED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS REGARDING THOSE ITEMS.

To successfully reduce or waive reserve funding, a majority of the membership (i.e., 51% of unit owners) must vote in favor of the reduction/ waiver.

If by the time of the budget meeting arrives the association has received insufficient votes, the board may delay approving the budget to attempt to collect more votes. Of course, realistically, the board may only postpone so much as the budget should be approved in time for coupon book deliveries prior to year-end. Further, the limited proxies are only valid 90 days from the date of the first scheduled budget meeting. So, if your association would like to vote to waive reserves but getting sufficient unit owner participation will be a struggle, it may be worthwhile to set the budget meeting earlier in the year than you would otherwise.

If a majority vote is not obtained, the board must approve the budget with full reserve funding. If a majority vote is obtained, the board must proceed with the waived or reduced reserve funding. It is important to note that any vote to waive or reduce reserves is only effective for one annual budget. Therefore, the vote must be obtained for every year the board would prefer not to fully fund reserves.

Why Fund Reserves?

Arguably one of the biggest problems facing condominium associations today is the failure to fully fund reserves. Many associations put little to no money aside, creating project delays and large special assessments. With the primary focus being low maintenance fees, boards can easily loose sight of the big picture reasons to fund reserves.

Let’s look at our roof example. The community’s roof has an estimated remaining useful life of 10 years and an anticipated replacement cost of $50,000. If an association does not put aside money routinely in a roof reserve account, then the unit owners would likely have to pay a $50,000 special assessment in 10 years. This is a negative outcome in several ways:

  1. Hesitancy to issue a special assessment or difficultly collecting the special assessment may lead to delays in project completion and further deterioration of the roof (i.e., more roof leaks which cost money to repair.
  2. The special assessment will be a burden on the unit owners.
  3. A special assessment is unfair in that prior unit owners did not have to contribute any money to the roof (though they benefited from it) while current unit owners have to pay for the entire thing. This creates an inequitable distribution of expenses.
  4. Limited reserve funds and a history of special assessments will drive away buyers, keeping home prices lower than they otherwise would have been.

I strongly recommend that every board fully fund reserves. If a board does not feel that full funding is feasible right away, they should still contract for a professional reserve study and establish a long-term plan for achieving full funding by gradually increasing reserve funds each year.

I hope this overview of condominium reserve funding was helpful.

Please let me know if you have any questions,

Emily

 Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a firm providing full-service community association management in the Tampa Bay Area as well as consulting, financial and legal services to all Florida community associations. 

→ 108 Comments

Posted in Financial, Florida Statutes

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Florida Condominium Association Board Election Procedures: Florida Statute 718.112(2)(d) and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 61B-23

Posted on January 31, 2014 | 300 Comments

The Florida Statutes, in combination with the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C), provide specific processes and procedures relating to condominium association Board member elections. These rules have been established to ensure fair elections and to provide all unit owners interested in running for a seat on the Board the opportunity to do so. Failure to follow these procedures not only creates unit owner distrust of the Board but may also result in fines pursuant to FAC Rule 61B-21. Further, the association may be required to repeat the entire election process. This post will outline the Board election process and provide guidance on issues including search committees and campaigning.

NOTE: These rules generally do not apply to timeshare condominiums. Condominiums with less than 10 units are not obligated to follow these procedures. In order to adopt different voting and election procedures , an association must obtain a 51% affirmative vote of the membership.

Regular Board elections to fill vacancies created by the expiration of a Board term must be held at the annual meeting of the membership regardless of whether a quorum is present. Any Board vacancies not filled by an election (e.g., not enough people ran for the Board, a Board member resigns) may be filled by a vote of the remaining Board members at a duly called Board meeting.

 

The Election Process

First Notice of Election

The first notice of election must be mailed, emailed (so long as an electronic consent form has been received) or hand-delivered at least 60 days prior to the annual meeting/ election day. This notice may be part of another unit owner communication such as a routine newsletter. There is no specific format in which this notice must be given but the notice should include, at a minimum:

  • The date, time and location of the annual meeting/ election
  • Details surrounding how a unit owner may become a candidate for the Board (discussed below)
  • Details surrounding the information sheet a Board candidate may submit (discussed below)

If the association fails to properly issue the first notice, the association must restart the notification process.

Receipt of Intents to Run for the Board

At least 40 days prior to the annual meeting/ election, all unit owners desiring to be candidates for the Board must inform the association in writing of their intent to run. Unit owners may send a letter (certified mail or regular mail), an email, a fax, or hand-deliver a written statement. I recommend that the association provide an “intent to run” form for unit owners to fill out. The association must issue a written notice of receipt of the unit owner’s intent to run and may deliver this receipt via mail, email, fax or hand-delivery.

At least 35 days prior to the annual meeting/ election, candidates for the Board may submit to the association an information sheet discussing their qualifications/ reasons for running for the Board. The information sheet must be a one-sided, 8.5”x11” sheet of paper. Associations may use two-sided printing when distributing the information sheets (discussed below) to reduce paper usage.

NOTE: At 40 days prior to the annual meeting/ election, if there are fewer candidates for the Board than spaces on the Board to fill, no election is necessary.

NOTE: At 40 days prior to the annual meeting/ election, unit owners that are more than 90 days delinquent in paying a monetary obligation to the association are not eligible to run for the Board. Further, felons that have not had their civil rights restored for at least 5 years are not eligible.

Second Notice of Election

The second notice of election must be mailed or hand-delivered (electronic transmission is not is NOT an option) between 14 and 34 days prior to the annual meeting/ election day. There is no specific format required for this notice but I recommend that it include:

  • Details surrounding how to cast a vote in the Board member election (discussed below)
  • Details surrounding how to fill out and submit the annual meeting limited proxy
  • Explanations of any specific items (e.g., surplus carryover, year-end financial reporting waive down) on which the association is requesting the membership vote

Along with the second notice, the association should include:

  • The agenda for the annual meeting
  • A limited proxy for quorum purposes (if interested, consider adding the vote to waive down the year-end financial reporting requirement to the annual meeting agenda and add the vote to the proxy)
  • A ballot including only the names of all candidates for the Board, listed alphabetically by surname (ensure all ballots are consistent in appearance)
  • An outer envelope labeled with the address of the property manager OR association (wherever you would prefer the votes go) and spaces for the owner’s unit number, name and signature
  • An inner envelope with nothing on the outside (unit owners that own more than one unit should have an inner envelope for each unit they own)

If the association fails to properly issue the second notice, the association must restart the notification process.

Voting in the Election

To cast a vote in the election, a unit owner must write their name, unit number and signature on the outside of the outer envelope. They must select their chosen candidates using the ballot (nothing else is to be written on the ballot, no write-in candidates are allowed) and place the ballot in the inner envelope. The inner envelope(s) must be placed into the outer envelope and should be mailed or hand-delivered to the association/ property manager. Unit owners may cast their votes using the same process at the annual meeting up to the point that outer envelopes begin to be opened. Once a ballot is submitted, it cannot be rescinded or changed.

NOTE: F.A.C has specific rules for voting machines.

Counting Votes

The vote count must be conducted at the annual meeting in a location that is visible to all attendees. Once all ballots have been collected, the names and unit numbers listed on the outer envelopes will be checked against a list of eligible voting by an impartial committee (i.e., no Board members, candidates, or family members of Board members/ candidates). Any outer envelopes without signature shall be marked with the word DISREGARDED and not included in the vote count. Once completed, all inner envelopes should be removed from outer envelopes and placed in a separate receptacle by the impartial committee. The inner envelopes will then be opened. Any inner envelopes with more than one ballot inside should be marked as DISREGARDED and not included in the vote count. The results should be announced at the annual meeting.

NOTE: In order for an election to be valid, at least 20% of the membership must have voted. If not achieved, the association must begin the election process again.

Runoff Elections

If there is a tie vote that creates the need for a runoff election, the association must send a Notice of Runoff Election during the 7 days after the annual meeting/ election. This notice must include a new ballot listing the tied candidates’ names, the candidates’ information sheets, as well as inner and outer envelopes. All previous voting and vote counting procedures must be followed. The runoff election must be held 21-30 days after the annual meeting/ election.

Fair Election Concerns

If unit owners are concerned that the association is not going to run a fair election, an election monitor may be petitioned using DBPR Form CO 6000-9. The F.A.C requires that the greater of 15% of the membership and 6 members sign the petition.

If a unit owner wishes to challenge an election, they must do so using the Department of Business and Professional Regulation’s complaint form within 60 days of the election results.

Election Official Records

The first notice, second notice, intents to run, information sheets, envelopes, and ballots (including those marked as DISREGARDED) are considered official records of the association and must be maintained for at least one year from the date of the election.

Search Committees and Campaigning

The F.AC is very clear that committees designed to officially nominate potential candidates for the Board (“ nominating committees”) are strictly prohibited. That being said, there is no reason why a Board can not put together a search committee responsible for identifying unit owners that may be good Board members and discussing with them the possibility of running for the Board. Further, there is nothing prohibiting current Board members or the association manger from encouraging certain unit owners to run for the Board.

Campaigning for Board elections is allowed per the FAC and the Florida Statutes; however, it is in the best interest of the Board so set up some guidelines regarding campaigning. For example, the Board may identify certain areas (e.g., an information board in a common area) that candidates can post campaign ads so as to avoid a candidate papering the property with “Vote for Me” posters.

NOTE: The community’s manager should remain impartial as it relates to Board elections. If your manager is telling unit owners how to vote in an election, consider submitting a complaint to the DBPR regarding their behavior.

If you have any questions about the above process, do not hesitate to comment or send me an email. Templates for any of the notices or forms discussed above are available upon request.

Emily

Emily Shaw is a condominium homeowner in Tampa, Florida and a Director of VERA Property Management, a firm providing full-service community association management in the Tampa Bay Area as well as consulting, financial and legal services to all Florida community associations. 

→ 300 Comments

Posted in Board Meetings, Elections, Florida Administrative Code, Florida Statutes

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Condo Association Reserve Funding: Component Method or Pooling Method

Posted on July 2, 2013 | 43 Comments

Anyone who has been involved with condominium associations knows about reserve funding. Chapter 718.112(1)(f) of the Florida Statutes requires that all associations put aside funds for large future projects such as building painting, roof replacement and any other project expected to cost more than $10,000. The amount of money that the association is going to contribute in any given year to reserves is included in the annual budget and is based on the expected cost and timing of future large projects. As Board members are not generally qualified to determine the remaining useful lives and replacement costs of the various parts of the condominium property, it is imperative that the Association hire a professional engineering firm that will complete a reserve study of the property and provide guidance to the Board. Reserve studies should be updated every 2-3 years to ensure that all estimates are still accurate. There are many different reserve study firms out there but I have had good experiences with Reserve Advisors in the past.

There are currently two different methods used to account for reserve funds. Below I have provided a brief comparison of the two methods.

The first method is called the Component or Straight Line Method. Here are several important things to consider about this method:

  1. Each maintenance project has its own reserve account and annual contributions to each account are determined by taking the current year’s project cost, subtracting the current value in the reserve account, and dividing it by the remaining useful life of the item.
  2. Once money is allocated to a specific reserve account, the Board cannot utilize those funds for any purpose other than that particular project without a majority vote of the homeowners. For example, if the Board has allocated $200,000 to the building painting reserve account based on expected cost, and the project’s actual cost only ends up being $150,000, they cannot use that additional funds for any other purpose. The extra $50,000 would be the initial value of the reserve account for the next time the buildings need to be painted. Likewise, if the project’s actual cost was $250,000, the Board cannot use reserves from any other reserve account to cover the additional $50,000 without a vote of the majority of the homeowners.
  3. Interest earned on reserve funds is kept separately and can be used for any reserve project.
  4. By using the current year project cost, as opposed to the expected project cost at the time of completion, this method does not take inflation into account. For projects that are expected to be completed in 1 or 2 years, this has a limited effect; however, for projects that are not expected to be completed for 15 or 20 years, this can cause an underestimation of the project cost.
  5. Expected interest that the reserve funds will earn is not taken into account in the association’s budget. If your association has material reserve funds, annual interest earned can be a material amount of money which, when using the component method, cannot be included in the reserve contribution calculations. Therefore, in essence, homeowners have to contribute more (the amount of interest earned annually) to the reserve accounts annually under the component method than they would if interest could be taken into account.

The second method utilized is called the Pooling or Cash Flow Method. Here are several important things to consider about this method.

  1. This method is similar to the component method; however, instead of having individual reserve accounts for each project, there is one pool of funds that can be used for any reserve project.
  2. Inflation is taken into account. For example, if a project is scheduled for two years from now, the current estimated cost of the project is $100,000, and annual inflation is expected to be 1%, then this method would require that the reserve pool have $102,010 available two years from now to complete the project. This is calculated as follows: $100,000*(1.01)^2.
  3. Earned interest is included in the reserve pool and anticipated future interest is taken into account. For example, let’s say that the reserve funds are held in a money market account with a .5% annual interest rate. If the pooled reserve account currently has $300,000, annual interest could be roughly estimated at $1,500. This is $1,500 that does not need to be contributed to the reserve pool from maintenance fees.
  4. Reserve studies anticipate property projects thirty years into the future and provide a schedule of annual reserve contributions for each of those thirty years. These schedules are set up to increase by no more than the estimated rate of inflation annually.

The following is an example that shows how the component and pooling methods would work in the same situation. Let’s assume the time has come to replace the roofing on all of the property’s buildings and the reserve account for this project has $250,000. Let’s also assume that the total amount of reserve funds for all projects is $750,000. If the actual cost of the project is $300,000, under the component method, the Board has several options. (1) The Board can wait to do the project until there is $300,000 in the roofing reserve account. If the roof replacement is urgent due to leaking or other issues, this may not be a feasible option. (2) The Board can issue a special assessment on the unit owners to make up the $50,000 deficit. (3) The Board can wait until the following year and increase maintenance fees substantially to make up the $50,000 deficit. (4) The Board can have a homeowner vote to take $50,000 from a different project reserve fund. This 4th option would require at least 51% of the homeowners to vote. Under the pooling method, the Board would be able to pay the $300,000 out of the $750,000 total reserve funds to complete the project in a timely fashion. The Board would then need to determine how to earn back the extra $50,000 that was used for the roofing project over future years. This could be done through an increase in reserve contributions in future years or, if lucky, another reserve project(s) will cost less than estimated. In the end, the pooling method provides significantly more flexibility to the Board and allows for more efficient project completion. However, it is also possible that the Board could decide to approve a $400,000 roofing proposal even though only $250,000 has been allocated for this project and, in doing so, could set up the community to not have enough funds down the road to complete the next big reserve project. In this case, a special assessment may be required which puts and unfair financial burden on the current homeowners.

So which method is right for your community? That decision is up to the homeowners. In order to switch from the component method (the method the majority of associations use) to the pooling method, a majority vote of the membership is required. If you are considering a switch to the pooling method in your community, there are several things to consider:

  1. When was the most recent reserve study completed? You should obtain a current reserve study using both the pooling and component methods to compare the required annual reserve contributions (typically the component method calls for higher contributions as it is the more conservative approach). If you are trying to avoid an increase in maintenance fees, switching to pooled reserves may help in that effort; however, this should not be the primary factor when deciding whether or not to switch to pooled reserves.
  2. Is the current Board fiscally responsible? Will future Boards be responsible with reserve funds? Pooled reserves allows the Board much more flexibility in reserve spending and, in the case of an irresponsible Board, this can lead to overspending.
  3. Is there a Board member that is comfortable enough with Excel to take the thirty year reserve schedule and adjust it based on actual project costs, changes in interest and inflation rates, and/ or changes in annual reserve contributions? This is very important because before a Board can decide if they should spend more on a particular project than estimated, or if they should complete a project sooner than anticipated, the impact on the reserve pool and future reserve contributions will need to be analyzed. You may be able to have the engineering firm that completed your reserve study complete this analysis for you but there would likely be a fee involved.
  4. How many reserve projects does your property have coming up? If you have a large property with many reserve projects, pooling reserves may benefit your community. Let’s examine why. Large communities may have one or two reserve projects annually and maybe more on rare occasions. If the community uses the component or straight-line method, they can only look to the reserve account for that particular project, and the earned interest account, when determining how much they can spend on that project. If the Board does not have sufficient funds in these accounts to complete the project and they don’t want to use operating funds or issue a special assessment, they may want to use some funds from a different reserve account (one that they think is overfunded or one that has funds remaining after a recently completed project). In order to do this, they would need a majority vote of the membership. Given that the estimates used to determine how much should be reserved for each project can often be inaccurate, it is possible that the Board could need multiple votes of the membership each year to move money between accounts in order to complete reserve projects. If your community is very active and obtaining a majority vote of the membership is easy to do, then this is no problem. However, in many communities, convincing a majority of the homeowners to submit a limited proxy can be a very time consuming task.

This post only serves to provide a brief overview of reserve funding methods. If you need any assistance in determining what the best path is for your community, feel free to email me.

Emily

→ 43 Comments

Posted in Financial

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,